Welsh regional body concedes procurement challenge over £40m contract award for demolition of power station

As Rhondda Cynon Taf Council is part of the quango, Cardiff Capital Region, should the council issue a statement regarding the recent judgment and the serious breach in a procurement challenge concerning the award of a £40 million contract for the demolition of Aberthaw Power Station?

Cardiff Capital Region has conceded liability, causation and sufficiently serious breach in a procurement challenge to the award of a £40 million contract for the demolition of Aberthaw Power Station.

Demolition is the first phase of a scheme developed by the regional body (a corporate joint committee of the 10 councils in South East Wales) for the carbon neutral regeneration of the Aberthaw site.

Cardiff City Counci was the contracting authority on behalf of Cardiff Capital Region for the demolition project.

According to Joseph Barrett KC and Ben Mitchell of 11KBW, who acted for the successful claimant Brown and Mason (BMG), the claims were due to be determined at a three-week High Court trial in March 2025.

However, at the pre-trial review on 31 January 2025 the defendant abandoned its defence of the proceedings.

Mrs Justice Jefford made declarations that:

  • Cardiff City Council’s conduct of the procurement was unlawful
  • BMG had submitted the most economically advantageous tender
  • If Cardiff City Council had acted lawfully, BMG would have been awarded the contract
  • BMG was entitled to damages, to be assessed.

According to Barrett and Mitchell, the allegations of breach of duty in the proceedings were extremely wide-ranging including that unlawful changes were made to the award criteria during the course of the procurement, and there was a very significant number of breaches of duty in the evaluation of bids, including manifest errors and failures to apply the published award criteria.

The claimant also alleged a failure to create or retain lawful or transparent records of the evaluation, and apparent bias in the conduct of the evaluation.

The proceedings will now proceed to the quantum stage. BMG’s claim is valued in excess of £10 million.

A spokesperson for Cardiff Capital Region said: “Liability has been admitted in respect of a procurement challenge by an unsuccessful bidder in relation to the demolition of the former coal-fired Aberthaw Power Station. This is currently the subject of ongoing legal proceedings (including any outcome on damages), and until that process is concluded, we are unable to comment further.”

Joseph Barrett KC and Ben Mitchell of 11KBW acted for BMG throughout the proceedings, instructed by Jon Hainey, Emily Beckwith and Heidi Parker of TLT LLP.

Joseph Barrett KC and Ben Mitchell successful in Aberthaw Power Station legal challenge

Joseph Barrett KC and Ben Mitchell acted successfully for Brown and Mason Limited (BMG) in its legal challenge to the award of the £40 million contract for the demolition of Aberthaw Power Station, the first phase of Cardiff City Council’s scheme for the carbon neutral regeneration of the Aberthaw site.

The claims were due to be determined at a 3-week High Court trial in March 2025. However, at the pre-trial review on 31 January 2025 Cardiff City Council abandoned its defence of the proceedings and conceded liability, causation and sufficiently serious breach.

The High Court (Jefford J) accordingly made declarations that:

  • Cardiff City Council’s conduct of the procurement was unlawful
  • BMG had submitted the most economically advantageous tender
  • If Cardiff City Council had acted lawfully, BMG would have been awarded the contract
  • BMG was entitled to damages, to be assessed.

The allegations of breach of duty in the proceedings (now conceded) were extremely wide-ranging:

  • Unlawful changes being made to the award criteria during the course of the procurement;
  • A very significant number of breaches of duty in the evaluation of bids, including manifest errors and failures to apply the published award criteria;
  • Failure to create or retain lawful or transparent records of the evaluation;
  • Apparent bias in the conduct of the evaluation;
  • Failing to disqualify the preferred bidder on grounds of its failure to meet a number of deadlines and other mandatory requirements;
  • Unlawful negotiation with the preferred bidder after the expiry of the tender deadline.

The proceedings will now proceed to the quantum stage. BMG’s claim is valued in excess of £10 million.

Joseph Barrett KC and Ben Mitchell acted successfully for BMG throughout the proceedings, instructed by Jon Hainey, Emily Beckwith and Heidi Parker of TLT LLP.

South East & Wales Demolition Framework

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/sale_of_aberthaw_power_station#incoming-1959675

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/aberthaw_power_station

Leave a Reply

Back To Top